|
|
|||
|
||||
|
ARTICLES IT OCCURRED, SO THERE IS AN "OCCURRENCE", RIGHT? REVISIONS TO OSHA STANDARDS REGULATING SLINGS CLARIFIES COMPLIANCE WITH LOAD CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS |
IT OCCURRED, SO THERE IS AN "OCCURRENCE", RIGHT? Lawsuits against contractors often allege defective workmanship and subsequent damage to a structure and/or damage to property within that structure. Commercial general liability policies are not always clear, however, in just what kinds of damage would be covered in such scenarios. Obviously, the definition of terms such as “property damage” and “occurrence” within the language of a policy is instructive, but even so called definitions can be unclear or ambiguous, when applied to novel facts. When an insurer’s duty to defend a contractor for a potential claim worth millions of dollars is on the line, the proper interpretation of policy terms is critical. REVISIONS TO OSHA STANDARDS REGULATING SLINGS CLARIFIES COMPLIANCE WITH LOAD CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS Prior to June 8, 2011, The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration Standards regulating load capacities for slings were pursuant to tables developed and based on the 1971 ANSI B30.9 Standards. In revising the standards, OSHA found that the load-capacity tables contained duplicative, inconsistent and outdated information that confused compliance requirements. The revisions are made both in the general industry standards and the construction standards. (Section 1910.184 and Section 1926.251) PRESS RELEASE: CONSTRUCTION FATALITIES DECLINE BY NEARLY 10 PERCENT BETWEEN 2009 AND 2010 AS INDUSTRY CONTINUES FOCUS ON WORKPLACE SAFETY Date: August 25, 2011 Click here to read the full press release. Click here for more information on the Johnson & Bell, Ltd. Construction group. |